CASF-2016
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions — scoring, ranking, docking, screening power tests.
Composite score: 76.2
Rubric (1–5 per criterion)
rigor
5/5
coverage
3/5
maintenance
2/5
adoption
5/5
quality
4/5
accessibility
3/5
industry_relevance
4/5
Metadata
Stages
Hit ID
Modalities
small-moleculeprotein-general
Task types
scoring-function-eval
License
Academic-only
First release
2016
Last updated
2019
Flags
none
Size & scope
- complexes: 285
- decoy_poses: 28500
Primary paper
Title
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 Update
Authors
Su M, Yang Q, Du Y, et al.
Year
2019
DOI / arXiv
Citations
430
Links
- Official site: http://www.pdbbind.org.cn/casf.php
- GitHub: N/A
- Leaderboard: N/A
Hosted by (initiatives)
Experts (primary authors / maintainers)
Groups (host labs / companies / consortia)
Related benchmarks
Notes (honest caveats)
Authoritative scoring-power eval; update cadence slow.